The Rebel Faction

Register today to customize your account.
Galactic Citizen

TCR R&D 1

Name/Model#: Implosion-class Super Star Destroyer Mk I.

Designer/Manufacturer: Somir Drive Yards

Combat Designation: Capital Starship

Length
2600 meters

Weapons
100 Turbolaser Batteries
100 Heavy Turbolaser Batteries
45 Concussion Missile Launchers
35 Ion Cannons
20 Tractor Beam Projectors
8 Gravity Well Projectors


Starfighter Squadrons
30 Squadrons TIE Raptors only. (5 Squadrons if made for normal fighters).

CREW: 79,144; 590 gunners
PASSENGERS: 38,000 troops
SPEED RATING: 10 MGLT
HYPERDRIVE: x2
HULL RATING: 10712 RU
SHIELD RATING: 8000 SBD
CONSUMABLES: 6 years

PLANETARY ASSAULT TROOPS: Full Corps of Stormtroopers and other soldiers; 10 AT-AT walkers; 20 AT-ST walkers; 1 Pre-fabricated Garrison Base

OTHER ONBOARD CRAFT: 10 Lambda-Class Imperial Shuttles; 7 Assault Shuttles


Description:

This vessel was created for the sole purpose of filling a hole in the Regime's navy. Though it has many ships capable of carrying many star fighters it lacks in authoratative firepower from any signature ship. This class of "Super Star Destroyer" was created for the purpose of blockading a system and destroying anything which may interfere with it's missions. Though alone it is vulnerable to hyperspace jumps from directions it can not reach combined with one or more escorts this vessel would be capable of blockading a system for an indetermined amount of time.

Comments

#29 10:00pm 17/05/03

I do believe that is the case. What I believe Maim was implying was that I could re-do the stats and such-like for this R&D and leave it for approval from someone who dosen't play a character in the group. Though the character is only semi-active.

I'll look into it.

Avatar
#28 5:24pm 17/05/03

Unfortunately, Maim, as a member of TCR, Beff is not even allowed to approve your R&Ds.

I think.

Avatar
#27 8:03am 17/05/03

If Beff chooses to do this then so be it, I'll discuss it with him.

#26 7:49am 17/05/03

Ok, let me make this a bit clearer.

I don't like doing R&Ds. So, one of two things can happen.

Beff can make adjustments to my post and I will look them over, and yes only Beff because I trust him, or it can be scrapped. I don't really care anymore either way.

Avatar
#25 6:18am 17/05/03

I can't approve this R&D, there are just so many things out of proportion with it.

Those troops being one of them. It will require serious revisions in every single department Maim, those that I have stated, emphasizing on those troops.

Avatar
#24 5:49am 17/05/03

Are we talking about the "Super" term? BTW, Beff, take another look at troops and such. They're a bit much.

#23 10:15pm 16/05/03

Right you are Seti.
I believe I've brought that up already a while back.

Avatar
#22 8:54pm 16/05/03

"Super" Star Destroyer is a generic term the Rebellion/Republic used to refer to anything bigger than an ISD. Hence the Dark Empire comics referring the Allegiance as a Super Star Destroyer.

#21 4:09pm 16/05/03

This couldn't possibly be classified as "super" unless it was a stinking lot bigger.

Right now it's twice the size of a standard ISD.

Avatar
#20 7:09am 16/05/03

R&D won't approved until:

<li>Weapons decreased and GWells severely decreased

or

<li>GWells decreased, size greatly increased

#19 7:06am 16/05/03

Yes, and I didn't listen to you then, either.

Avatar
#18 6:19am 16/05/03

Dude... you habe [b]500[/b] turbolasers. Remember, a battery = four cannons fired as one. I can't make demands, but that's a hellalot of lasers.

And 38 000 troops seems an awful lot... I'd say about 14 000, max. Hull should be toned down, still.

Didn't I already say most of this?

Avatar
#17 2:54am 16/05/03

You'll have to increase the size and explain the power output to have those.

Gravity Well Generators are EXTREMELY energy sucking, and Interdictors alone are extremely expensive due to that technology.

#16 2:21am 16/05/03

There.

That is all the editing that you get. If it isn't good now, scrap it.

#15 2:09am 16/05/03

Speak with Lup on this one aswell.

I'll have to retract my approval until certian restrictions are met.

In the mean time I have no other points to make on this R&D which have not already been made.

12>>>