TRS: Project#5 Pulsar-Class Cruiser
<img border=0 src="http://www.geocities.com/whole_fn_show_2001uk/ship3.txt" />Pulsar-Class Cruiser
Combat Designation:Combat Cruiser
Length:800 meters
Crew: 8536
Shield Rating:
Hull Rating:
Speed: 18 MGLT
Weapons
50 Double Heavy Turbolaser Cannons
50 Heavy Turbolaser Cannons
10 Ion Cannons
20 Concussion Missile Launchers
4 Tractor Beam Projectors
Fighter Capacity: Two squadrons
Other Onboard Craft:
4 Shuttles
2 Landing Barges
(Please note that this is the swarm Equivilent of the Aegis 2. The shield and hull ratings have been left blank as I dont have them off hand, but if anyone does, they can kindly tell me them, or fill them in themselves.)
Background: Assessments of recent swarm battle data indicated that the frontline battlefleet was seriously laking in vital firepower needed to take on the more ferocious of enemies that are being encountered at an exponential rate. The ancestral, while versatile and durable, did not come equipped with the necessary punch for combat duties as a frontline craft.
Therefore, with recent analysis of traded and captured vessels, swarm scientists where able to rework the existing Aegis design for thier own uses. Admittadly a rushed refit, the newly christened Pulsar-Class seeks to fill that gap in the navy that the Ancestral could not, and Gunship squadrons never hoped to fill.
Comments
#5 9:49am 30/07/03
as TRS no longer exists...
this is null and void...
#4 4:10am 30/07/03
I don't think anyone has actually found the shield/hull ratings for the Aegis Two, though I could be wrong. All I know is that they are supposed to be pretty weak, because of the amount of weapons. Perhaps if someone posted a thread in the OOC forum asking for the shield/hull ratings, and if we don't get them, the R&D staff/admins and mods make some reasonable ratings, and say that it applies to all Aegis class ships, cause the Aegis 1 is basicly the same as the Aegis 2, and the Carriers are pretty well equiped themselves. Another thing you could do is for the shield/hull ratings is just say, "Same as the Aegis II", giving people the idea that these should be treated as Aegis II cruisers, and that it has weak shields.
#3 11:11pm 09/07/03
As an Aegis equivalent, I have zero problems with this, we just need shield/hull ratings.
#2 11:00pm 09/07/03
Its the Aegis 2, just not cosmetically . . .
#1 10:54pm 09/07/03
Im thinking a weapons reduction or a ship size increase
otherwise all we need is a hull/sheild rating and its good