General R&D: Bakura - Class Destroyer
From CUSWE -Bakura-class Destroyer
this warship was developed by the Bakurans in the years after their liberation from the Ssi-ruuvi invasion force. At 850 meters in length, they were formidable ships. They required 8,250 crewmen and 275 gunners, and could transport up to 2,000 troops and 36,000 metric tons of cargo. The Bakura-class destroyer was armed with 60 turbolaser batteries, 60 ion cannons, and 10 tractor beam projectors. They were also equipped with a hyperwave inertial momentum sustainer (HIMS) system. The power plant of this design was based on the Imperial-II class Star Destroyer, but the exterior was much more fluid in shape than the angular Imperial warship
No shield or hull listings, so... I am going to go with:
1800 SBD
1800 RU
Class 1 Hyperdrive
18 MGLT
EDIT: Took the shield and hull ratings down by two hundred and gave the MGLT rating equal to that of an Aegis cruiser.
Comments
#18 4:08pm 20/10/03
Riiiiight. Keep it R&D spesific.
#17 6:22am 20/10/03
Maybe he took offence to you calling him a faggot, and has decided to respond by annoying the hell out of you.
Or maybe he just finds it arousing.
*shrug*
#16 5:20am 20/10/03
What are you following me around?
Christ, just go away, Kyric.
#15 1:09am 20/10/03
And who amongst those peace loving hippies desgined them? The former Imperials.
#14 11:53pm 19/10/03
Huh?
They were designed by the 'Bakurans' to combat the Ssi-ruuvi.
#13 3:53pm 19/10/03
Bakuran ships are almost Imperial as Imperials desgined them.
#12 4:07am 19/10/03
But we're diversifying. That's the idea.
#11 2:15am 19/10/03
Sure I can. Most of your ships are Imperial.
#10 1:42am 19/10/03
Yes, yes. Can't say we are using 'Imperial ships' anymore, bucko. .
#9 1:20am 19/10/03
1800 SBD shields aren't "crap". With that number of weapons and that speed, they are in fact still quite powerful.
#8 10:55pm 18/10/03
Because compaired to most ships of it's size, it has a crap shield ratings, thanks to the high weapons.
#7 5:43pm 18/10/03
Instead of overpowering craft, why not just redesigned the Aegis II.
#6 2:10am 18/10/03
Ok, had not thought of the Aegis II. APPROVED
#5 1:21am 18/10/03
edited...
#4 10:53pm 17/10/03
Aegis Two has 134 weapons enplacements, and based on general agreement of the staff, has 1500 SBD/1200RU. The Aegis Two has 24 fighters, the Bakura Destroyer has none(based on those stats). Also, the Aegis's weapons included 100 Heavy Turbolaser Cannons(50 Double, 50 single) and 20 Concussion Missile Launchers, which take up more room(due to storage of missiles and such), so a higher shield ratings would seem natural.
MGLT ratings for the Aegis is 18, so Griff might want to base his off that.
12>>>