Outer-Rim R&D #10
Model (Abridged): Mk. I Graviton Detector, Design Scheme No. 4Designation: Supplemental Starship Sensor; Auxiliary Targeting Engine
Research Board: Undisclosed – Bureau of Sovereignty Intelligence
Production Rights: Outer-Rim Drive Yards [All] – Secondary Distribution Restrictions Undefined (Military, Commercial, and Otherwise)
Components:
1.) System Core, Primary Interface; Unit [3’ 3’ 5’], 5th Vacant Expansion Block (Standard)
2.) Secondary Interfaces, 3; Unit [1’ 2’ 3’ Min.], 1st Bridge, 2nd-3rd Optional, Varies
3.) Reception Mounds, 3000 Nodes per, 2000+ (Varies with Vessel); Unit [1’ 1’ ½’ Overall], Varies (Equal Distribution)
4.) Integration Circuitry, –Battle Charts –Star Charts –Weapon Systems –Maneuvering Systems; Unit [Length Varies], Primary Line Conduits
5.) Static Relay Link, Linear Transmitter, 6+ (Varies with Vessel); Unit [2’ 2’ 3’ Overall], Varies (Equal Distribution)
Scanning Radius: Standard
Conventional methods of detection beginning to pale in comparison to the stealth technology rapidly reaching the assembly lines of its enemies, the Outer-Rim Sovereignty now must respond to the call for greater efficiency in the sensor capabilities available and “standard” to the vast majority of its fleets. While several previous attempts to remedy the crisis have failed, shown to come up short to the contingency safeguards of the opposition, these unintentional investigations of trial-and-error have gone to forge a new method of detection unhampered by existing masks.
While the system utilizes the newest innovations in engineering to gather and communicate its data, the technique of the collection is untraditional in its own right: the mapping of gravitational fields. Omnipresent in average conditions and, for all intensive purposes, uninfluenced by the behavior of the electromagnetic spectrum, if pinpointed to even an inexact area a graviton, when viewed with clusters of others, can shed “light” on what light cannot.
Recent advances in precision probing and surgery, though making it relatively easy to identify specifics in the attitudes of gravitational energy, can only provide sloppy, convoluted sketches of the fields that form. This information, what is received from the negative pressure calculated to pull on super-sensitive “nodes” contained in environments otherwise cleansed of natural exertions, and then applied to various algorithms detailing the known behavior of gravity, can be simplified, however, by applying the gravitic knowledge of pre-identified bodies of mass. The gravity signatures of nearby celestial bodies and vessels, for instance, can be discounted using the resources of star and battle charts, resulting in a clearer picture of the objects masked from conventional sensors. And, all the while, additional data is obtained from hidden targets employing unstable forms of gravitational masking. Due to the primary need of limiting recognition by means of the electromagnetic spectrum, a “bent space” method usually results in these vessels to bypass the latter while only hoping to bypass the former, leaving a significant loophole: when blotting-out the effects of electromagnetic sensory pulses, slight but detectable distortions surface in the seemingly nonexistent field of gravity (suspected a result of unaccounted for activity). Therefore simple devices equipped to the “mounds” of each node collective rapidly fire and scatter photons to locations inadequately touched by the light of nearby stars.
A final map is then produced by the system incorporating imprecise (albeit with a margin of uncertainty hardly greater than that of standard sensors) but accurate locations of objects hidden from primary scanners, which is then transmitted to weapon systems – automated or manned – and viewable separately or with the combined data of all probes.
Data of any step of the process can be transmitted to other starships capable of receiving standard transmissions, but in the form of more localized – and therefore defendable – signals. Information is sent in the form of “linear transmissions,” broadcast signals a great deal more concentrated, with the advantage of being easily lined with anti-jamming frequencies, however with each “beam” needing a specified target rather than a range. Every array is capable of maintaining such links with as many as 2,000 other vessels, multiple arrays connected to the same receiving target when possible, with blind spots resulting only when a direct line of contact cannot be established from any array of any transmitting starship.
Status:
Research – 20 Days, 12/2
Post-Production Installations – 5 Days, 12/7
Comments
#27 5:46am 19/11/03
alright, one more prefunctory question...
since when you been part of ORS...?
#26 5:43am 19/11/03
From what Kas just sent me about it, yes, I suppose it is.
However the difference in method not only reduces the price (the crystals?), it seems, but clears up a couple of flaws mentioned in the brief description.
No "sensor scan" reflection here, though.
#25 5:32am 19/11/03
[quote]Pick me out what you refer to, if you please.. [/quote]
my bad, that was the old Shroud
So this is like a cheap CGT eh?
#24 5:20am 19/11/03
Stick a ball in a bowl and the Earth's gravity won't stop pulling on the ball.
No, a gravitational field that from a given perspective may seem to be blocked by another can still be detected from that very perspective.
#23 5:06am 19/11/03
Huh? Damn Hexanese...
But this is an experimental, sensor, correct? Ergo, if a Shroud and a Star Destroyer are flying in formation, won't it look like the presence of the Shroud is merely part of the mass of the Star Destroyer?
#22 3:12pm 18/11/03
Lupercus:
[quote]...by applying the gravitic knowledge of pre-identified bodies of mass. [b]The gravity signatures of nearby celestial bodies and vessels[/b], for instance, can be [b][i]discounted[/i][/b] using the resources of star and battle charts, [b]resulting in a clearer picture of the objects masked from conventional sensors[/b].[/quote]
Drayson:
This should go also to answer your question, if only in part. Although the gravity of one body of mass can't be "cancelled" by that of another, at most the [i]effects[/i] of the one going to make those of the other relatively insubstantial, further processing is nonetheless made easier (for organization's sake) if extraneous information is, as I said, "discounted."
#21 7:46am 18/11/03
Wouldn't this also be thrown off by the presence of other ships?
#20 7:45am 18/11/03
"by applying the gravitic knowledge of pre-identified bodies of mass."
That suggests you must have preknowledge of the craft you're facing, and to my knowledge noone has captured a shroud, or Guild Class.
#19 7:23am 18/11/03
Ceros, I would wish to speak to you via IM about this, ezInbox me with your prefered client. I have all but Yahoo.
#18 6:11am 18/11/03
Point taken, Drayson.
If you need anything else defined, feel free..
#17 6:00am 18/11/03
...That statement refers to the overall mapping of gravity without the exclusion of known bodies of mass.
What you say of the Shroud implies that it produces no gravity at all, or that it compensates for the gravity exerted on it by all other bodies of mass, and at any given location, by the means of...anti-matter?
[url=http://pub33.ezboard.com/fswalliancefrm24.showMessage?topicID=184.topic]pub33.ezboard.com/fswalli...=184.topic[/url]
Pick me out what you refer to, if you please..
#16 5:55am 18/11/03
That quote is from the OOC forum, correct?
Comments are allowed and encouraged in the R&D sectors.
#15 5:28am 18/11/03
[quote]can only provide sloppy, convoluted sketches of the fields that form[/quote]
Not quite, speaking for the Shroud alone, is made to form a seamless gravity feild around it to match the area outisde that of the vessel....
On further reading I can see the rest of your system works on this same principal, which the Shroud alone is made to counter...
#14 4:40am 18/11/03
And you the Shroud before you deny it. I'm sorry to say that lowest on the totem defines the standard.
[quote]...You are in no way involved in this thread and thus for you should stay out...[/quote]
I'm sure, Drayson, that the staff will adequately represent your stance.
#13 4:20am 18/11/03
Read the R&D for the Mandalorian Cloak before you say that...
<<<123>>>