Player Observations
As the same is true in the [url="http://pub33.ezboard.com/fswalliancefrm4.showMessage?topicID=2491.topic"]OOC forum[/url],If you are not:
<li>The Submitting Player
<li>A member of that Players Group
<li>An R&D Mod or Staff Member
Then don't post in any R&D Submission threads, consequnces issuied from such offenses will come from the R&D staff just as they would from the regular board staff. To accomadate those with a need to assist the R&D staff without notice a stickied thread will be posted in which you may post your issuies about specific R&D's.
The format of these posts must be made in said manner:
Subject: The R&D your comment is about
Comment: A short synopses about your issuie
Comments
#10 12:23am 26/01/06
Om, I ment that the R&D was done in the old system, made its way onto the Approved list, but was never approved...
#9 6:23pm 25/01/06
If the R&D's were approved under the old system, that is fine. If the R&D's were written after new system was in place, then if there are no 500 word rp's for the tech it should not be in a fleet rp.
If there are, they should be removed.
In fleet rp's, one of the first things done is verification & info request of R&D's being used (as either approved under old system or with rp for new system).
I've not seen this done for the current war.
#8 5:21pm 25/01/06
Well in either case there are several notable GC R&Ds that have no 500-word Demo threads attached, that have been used in past and current threads.
#7 4:24pm 25/01/06
There is no more approval for R&D's. We are allowing people to slit their own throats when designing stuff and using it. The only decision we will make as staff is either to remove the R&D totally or decide that (based on the use of a person's uber craft) that they cannot handle the use of R&D's and so their group will be denied the privilege of having R&D'd craft.
We don't really care if a person thinks they can design a badass ship, tank or whatever. What we care about is it's reasonable use in roleplay. Notice I do not say logical. Everyone becomes a lawyer when it's their craft on the chopping block.
That is why some R&D's that people think are too uber are not removed. Because they haven't been used in actual roleplay.
That being said, I believe the Azguard God's are a storyline vehicle. So they cannot go attacking ships or whatever. Basically, in the same manner that your hypergate network can play no part in fleet roleplays.
#6 1:36pm 25/01/06
Heres an Observation...
The Azguard Gods...
never approved as an R&D, I believe that it was just agreed that they would be RP'd and not actually approved after that.
#5 6:07pm 20/07/05
What are you wondering about them?
That R&D was drawn up by Rac, and I did some modifications of it. I'm open to suggestions if you need things changed....
#4 7:27am 20/07/05
[b]Subject:[/b] Khepri Crawler Transport
[b]Comment:[/b] Wondering about the length, height and width measurement increments...
#3 5:34am 29/07/04
[QUOTE=Kas]I forget what a DMB is.[/QUOTE]
Dave Matthew's Band... duh.
#2 5:14pm 19/05/04
using the same equation used for the other weapons id go:
PI: 50m
PT: 20m
Missles: 0m (absorbed)
Torpedo: 5-10m depending
#1 3:51am 19/05/04
Omega Cloud
What damage would a Planetary Ion Cannon, Planetary Advanced Turbolaser, or ion torpedo do to this?
<<<123