The Rebel Faction

Register today to customize your account.
Galactic Citizen

The Rebel Faction » Forums » General Discussion » Rebel Cafe » Science fiction?...or science fact?...

1  9:10pm 22/05/10        
Admin - New Republican - VC Magnate - Reasonable Redcoat
[size=6]'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
[/size]


[indent]Even some scientists worry we lack the means to weigh up the risks such novel organisms might represent, once set loose

[/indent]Susan Watts BBC Newsnight [url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/susanwatts/2010/05/assessing_the_impact_of_venter.html"]Read Susan Watts's thoughts[/url] [url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/seealso/2010/05/science_view_creating_artifici.html"]Analysis from around the world[/url] [url="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/haveyoursay/2010/05/will_synthetic_organisms_do_mo.html"]Send us your comments[/url]
Dr Venter and his colleagues are already collaborating with pharmaceutical and fuel companies to design and develop chromosomes for bacteria that would produce useful fuels and new vaccines.

But critics say that the potential benefits of synthetic organisms have been overstated.

Dr Helen Wallace from Genewatch UK, an organisation that monitors developments in genetic technologies, told BBC News that synthetic bacteria could be dangerous.

"If you release new organisms into the environment, you can do more harm than good," she said.

"By releasing them into areas of pollution, [with the aim of cleaning it up], you're actually releasing a new kind of pollution.

"We don't know how these organisms will behave in the environment."

[url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm#skip_feature_02"]Continue reading the main story[/url][indent]The risks are unparalleled, we need safety evaluation for this kind of radical research and protections from military or terrorist misuse

[/indent]Julian Savulescu Oxford University ethics professor [url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10138849.stm"]Profile: Craig Venter[/url] [url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10134341.stm"]Q&A: The meaning of synthetic life[/url] [url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10138831.stm"]Ethics concern over synthetic cell[/url]
Dr Wallace accused Dr Venter of playing down the potential drawbacks.

"He isn't God," she said, "he's actually being very human; trying to get money invested in his technology and avoid regulation that would restrict its use."

But Dr Venter said that he was "driving the discussions" about the regulations governing this relatively new scientific field and about the ethical implications of the work.

He said: "In 2003, when we made the first synthetic virus, it underwent an extensive ethical review that went all the way up to the level of the White House.

"And there have been extensive reviews including from the National Academy of Sciences, which has done a comprehensive report on this new field.

"We think these are important issues and we urge continued discussion that we want to take part in."

Ethical discussions Dr Gos Micklem, a geneticist from the University of Cambridge, said that the advance was "undoubtedly a landmark" study.

But, he said, "there is already a wealth of simple, cheap, powerful and mature techniques for genetically engineering a range of organisms. Therefore, for the time being, this approach is unlikely to supplant existing methods for genetic engineering".

The ethical discussions surrounding the creation of synthetic or artificial life are set to continue.

Professor Julian Savulescu, from the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, said the potential of this science was "in the far future, but real and significant".

"But the risks are also unparalleled," he continued. "We need new standards of safety evaluation for this kind of radical research and protections from military or terrorist misuse and abuse.

"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm."

The advance did not pose a danger in the form of bio-terrorism, Dr Venter said.

"That was reviewed extensively in the US in a report from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a Washington defence think tank, indicating that there were very small new dangers from this.

"Most people are in agreement that there is a slight increase in the potential for harm. But there's an exponential increase in the potential benefit to society," he told BBC's Newsnight.

"The flu vaccine you'll get next year could be developed by these processes," he added.




Taken from BBC news website:

[url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm"]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm[/url]



By Victoria Gill Science reporter, BBC News
2  11:38pm 23/05/10        
Avatar
Jedi Masterwan ... ... Shaken, Not Stirred
Yeah this is pretty cool.
Bananas