Or do we pick and chose when it applies, in order to screw TNO?
Why not? It's reciprocation.

Or do we pick and chose when it applies, in order to screw TNO?
It was continious, unabated military build up that bankrupted the Soviet Union (as well as poor economic planning in general, granted, but many credit the nuclear arms race as the biggest contributor). And it is military spending that has so damaged North Korea's economy.
I am not suggesting nor looking for a bean counting policy wherein we assign specific values to planets and need a supercomputer to decide the exact size of our armies. That would be foolish...
Which suggests to me that the realism "rule" is just a word, which means nothing. The GC is allowed to operate unrealistically, and TNO is not allowed to operate realistically.
So, what's the deal? Are we actually going to make an effort to play with some sense of realism, or not? Or do we pick and chose when it applies, in order to screw TNO?
Corise Lucerne:
True. But do we forget the United States undoubtably spent the most money on its military than either Soviet Russia or North Korea? Moreover, the United States is more akin in philosophy and government than either of the other two countries mentioned. This is a case where I don't think there is a direct parallelism that can be made, at least from history.
Not an applicable arguement, in that the US has never had it's home beaten asunder in multipe wars.
[22:14] RogueLightSider: Omnae should let you know when he knocks you up methinks.
[22:14] LeiaOrganaSolo39: haha he must be really teeny, I didnt feel a thing!