The Rebel Faction » Forums » General Discussion » Rebel Cafe » Will Moore's facts check out?
Return of the King of the Cafe!
Silence is proof that no one can argue any more he was just making it up or lying.
The Eleventh Seeker
Either that or I'm tired of saying that all indications say that Moore managed to stay honest on this one. Another factor could be that maybe I'm not interested in wasting hours looking up Moore's sources, because I know that anything I find will be shrugged off?
fuck that duck
Yes, Kas. A multi-paragraph, blow by blow account of how your sources are wrong is really shrugging it off.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
Internaut
Can't help it if you want to waste time rebutting sources I had not linked to.
fuck that duck
Right. Because the site you did link too wasn't another carbon copy screaming "Moore is a liar."
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
Internaut
I linked to no sites in this thread.
Return of the King of the Cafe!
Yeah, but did you not once say that you have in the past linked more then enough Anti-Moore sites?
I just provided a link proving that the movie is undisputedly backed up with sources, and that if anything proves to be wrong then it is only because the sources Moore used turned out to be wrong. And he doesn't seem to be using Fringe Sources so I don't think that they can be so easily doubted at face value.
I just provided a link proving that the movie is undisputedly backed up with sources, and that if anything proves to be wrong then it is only because the sources Moore used turned out to be wrong. And he doesn't seem to be using Fringe Sources so I don't think that they can be so easily doubted at face value.
fuck that duck
Wow, Kas. That's like Bush saying "I have done no drugs in the last 25 years." It's true! But what does it say about what happened 26, or 27, or more years ago?
Basically, Kas, what you said is meaningless.
Basically, Kas, what you said is meaningless.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
Internaut
Dolash, where did I say this?
Isstal, the issue still stands that you rebutted a source I had not called upon to back a point I had made.
Isstal, the issue still stands that you rebutted a source I had not called upon to back a point I had made.
fuck that duck
If you like Kas, I can copy and paste that and substitute whatever name I put for whatever name you put, and it will all still apply. There's no escaping the fact that the people who refute Moore with claims like "he lied" are bullshitters.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]