I know exactly "what the fuck I am talking about", and you know it.
Then you're doing an awful good job at hiding it, because it certainly looks like you have no idea what you're talking about. The American media is notoriously right wing (cue whiny "it is not!!!" response).
And you're ignorant enough to believe that if it was on CNN, or CBC, or whatever it is you watch, it has to be true.
It's not.
I don't need an "insider" to see that the situation in Iraq is far removed from what the American media claims it is. If you'd pull your head out of your ass and watch news that isn't owned by Rupert Murdoch, you would know that.
But you haven't, and you don't know what you're talking about. You, for example, actually believe that the Iraqis are in control of their own country. It doesn't take a genius to realize the situation - it takes someone who isn't wearing "Yay for Bush" beer goggles to notice that without the USA, there would be no Iraqi government.
You're entire "argument" is refuted by the simple fact that you're
wrong. You're not arguing a point - you're arguing for the sake of arguing, on an issue that you don't know a thing about, and you're failing because you can't get over your immaturity enough to realize that this isn't about how much you hate me or whatever the fuck is going on inside your head - it's about you being wrong, pure and simple.
You can cry all you like that I'm a bastard/moron/insensitive jerk, but it doesn't change anything. You're wrong. I'm by no means 100% in the right all the time - but at least I have some idea of what I'm saying.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]