The Rebel Faction

Register today to customize your account.
Galactic Citizen

The Rebel Faction » Forums » General Discussion » Rebel Cafe » Kraker's Theory of Poloticians.....

<<<>>>123456

21  3:34am 16/07/04        
Avatar
D2K Style
So, graduating from Yale with a 2.0 doesn't scream slacker as well?

Anyway, what is consider a good voting record in the Senate? Nice how that's never mentioned, anywhere.
Well okay, you can vote for Bush, but if I go to war it's on your head.
22  3:42am 16/07/04        
Internaut
If you can't refute the list, you're just blasting hot air Isstal.


Dogman, yes, it does.
23  3:43am 16/07/04        
Return of the King of the Cafe!
Brutus Nogoth:
Dolash, John Kerry threw away his war medals, and protested the Vietnam War.
Now one of his main campaign themes is how much Vietnam built his character.

I don't think he patriotic- he just changes his viewpoint to whatever position is politically adventageous at the time.

Much like how he voted for the Iraqi War Resolution, but after seeing Howard Dean energize Democrats by bashing Bush for conducting the war, he changed his mind and went against his own voting record to declare himself as a "anti-war" candidate- while still maintaining his commitment to troops in Iraq.

Bush, for all his faults and failures, is at least consitent- even if its consistently stupid.
First of all, I am surprised by your stance about his stance about Vietnam. He went there, and is free to have his own opinion of the war. If his opinion is that it was something that needed to be protested, no one is better qualified for knowing this then someone who was actually there. That was an unjust war and as those medals were his he was free to do what he liked with them. If he felt that which he had done to earn them was for an unjust cause, then he is also free to feel disdain towards them.

Next, about the flip-flopping. One of the most important things about democracies is debate, discussion, and the free exchange of ideas. Consistancy can also mean stubborness, something which can be potentially deadly when your decisions affect the entire nation. If he changes his mind then that is not nessecarily a bad thing, perhaps he is swayed, or feels that different action is needed. Even if he changes to fit the majoirty, at least its' better then snubbing the people.

I'm not pro-Kerry, I really don't know enough about the guy, but I must say that the tactics used by the media and conservatives against him are all either frustraitingly pointless (Medal throwing? Who CARES?? Its' just medals!) or seemingly unsupported (I've heard some say he flip-flops for political benefit and say he's an out-of -the-mainstream liberal in the SAME sentance).

I also don't like how Bush can be called conservative and thats' ok, but Liberal is used like some huge political smear on the Johns. The vast majority of people in America seem to be moving left ever so slowly, and yet Conservatives seem to try and maintain the old system of liberals as weaklings and conservatives as mighty champions of traditional values.
24  3:50am 16/07/04        
fuck that duck
LOL @ Kas. You're vaunted list doesn't contain a single source. It doesn't need refuting - it can't stand up to any scrunity. But I guess that's fine, because it's aimed at anti-Kerry conservatives who don't care about proof.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
25  3:53am 16/07/04        
fuck that duck
Dolash: talk to nearly any American. If you ask them about their beliefs and values, they come far closer to those that the Democrats stand for, and the Republicans claim to stand for. But, unfotunately, they too believe what the Media tells them to, and thus too often vote Conservative.

2000 showed us that the majority if Liberal. Bush may have stolen the election, but Gore won it. That matters.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
26  3:57am 16/07/04        
Internaut
No, no, Isstal, it doesn't work that way. I provide a source, and then, if you wish to continue the debate, you need to refute it. If the source cannot stand any scrutiny, then it should be relatively simple for you to find counter-evidence that removes it.
27  4:03am 16/07/04        
fuck that duck
I'm glad Kas gets to make up the rules now. But no, Kas. The reason people listen to Michael Moore is because he backs up his facts with something we call sources. You visit mm.com, and he directs you to where to get your proof.

You visit this "list" and you get "here are your facts". Why would I waste time disproving something that you can't prove to begin with?
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]
28  4:13am 16/07/04        
Internaut
It doesn't matter where I get the sources. If you rebut them, then I look silly for providing sources that were not proven.

Rebut my source.
29  4:20am 16/07/04        
Blink If You Can Hear Me
s'Il:
I live ten minutes away from Hooters. Anyone hungry?

I'll eat, if you wear the shirt.
OS: In a world of bon-bons, you are a twinkie.
Ahnk: God damn you, I am Count Chocula and you know it.
I'm not spending my anniversary night thumping my head against the wall. - Damalis, on Moderating TRF
Then tell him you want it harder, damnit! - Ahnk, on Damalis
30  4:34am 16/07/04        
fuck that duck
Kas, you looked stupid for providing a source that's written by a guy and posted to a message board already. If Michael Moore had used a source like that when producing Bowling for Columbine, you would have jumped on him yelling "he's using a bullshit source!".

For my part, I don't consider your link a source of any note. If it were posted on a major newsgroup, or written by an acredited person, than it might have some weight. But it's not.

The great thing about the internet, Kas, is than anyone can put together a list and post it up, and people like you will believe it.
[size=1]"So the woman asked me what I wanted on the sandwich and I said I do not care it is for a duck, and she was like oh then it's free. I was not aware that ducks eat for free at Subway. It's like give me a chicken fajita sub, but don't worry about ringing it up, it is for a duck.”
-Mitch Hedberg
[/size]

<<<>>>123456