To formalize our difference of opinions into words, in the
sincere hope that we can come to an understanding, let me present the crux of my argument.
The concept of this raid is that you possess overwhelming force. Your armies are vast and your fleet fearsome. This prison is like alcatraz, and those who enter never return. However, to make it more exciting, give me a chance, and generally to make it more heroic, part of the idea is for the attackers to have the element of suprise.
The first few times the galactic liberation front blew stuff up, did we complain they were ignoring our planetary defenses or our super-keen investigators? No, we had to try and stop them mid-plan.
Thus, since Dolash is a Jedi, and used his powers to calm the concerns of the commander in space as to the nature of his intent, he would be able to get closer to the planet safely. However, before he reached those systems on the planet's surface that could detect him, the ship veered off course and landed distant from the prison camps, out of the range of your scanners by parking very far away. You might know we're out there, but you don't know where we parked or where we are now.
Of course, it is theoretically possible you
could have seen that. A ship might have been warned by scanners below that they hadn't seen the shuttle yet, but before the shuttle was too far for the ships to lock on to and track. You could say that happens, because it's theoretically possible, but is that heroic? Is that good storytelling? It's not so much outwitting me so much as it is arguing my gamble should fail simply because there is a way by which it could. My hope rested on that you wouldn't be fast enough to spot me before I hid my ship, and it would be better to find a way to stop me through an idea of your own then refuting one of mine.
Well, I'm just saying.