The Rebel Faction

Again Demo

You're wrong

Exit poll's have and always will be inaccurate when people give the wrong information.

The fact that you think you're right proves it, you think everyone will give accurate information when they are asked who they voted for... tell me, why should I tell someone who I voted for when it isn't any of there god forsaken business?

I can tell you flat out, that a lot of republicans who voted for Bush, told those people that they voted for Kerry. I know I did, and so did a lot of my friend's

Exit poll's have and always will be inaccurate when people give the wrong information.

And night follows day.

The fact that you think you're right proves it, you think everyone will give accurate information when they are asked who they voted for... tell me, why should I tell someone who I voted for when it isn't any of there god forsaken business?

Prove it. Exit poles have never been so far out of synch with the results. Even in Florida 2000 they matched closer than this year. Obviously, there is some margin for error - but you fail to explain why the margin grew so vastly between 2000 and 2004. Did a majority of voters simply decide to start lying? Or is there something more serious at stake?

You refuse - flat out - to even consider the facts. You assume that the difference is simply and only because some people weren't truthful. That's simple ignorance.

I can tell you flat out, that a lot of republicans who voted for Bush, told those people that they voted for Kerry. I know I did, and so did a lot of my friend's.

Do you speak for "a lot of Republicans". No. And if people are as untrustworthy as you claim, shouldn't the Republicans lying and the Democrats lying balance each other out?

The fact that you so willfully ignore is that exit poles have never been so far out of synch. They have always been a fairily true reflection of the results.

Not so this year.

We had a few of those at our polling station. It happens when people decide they like all the candidates, so they select every one on the ballot.

That is, though, not what the author is talking about. For you to know that people punched every hole you have to have looked at the ballot (and presumably you would record the number of ballots). He's talking about ballots that are simply thrown out without being looked at.

Way to change the subject, though.

Translated: People specializing in making numbers dance to their tune guessed what color someone's skin was based upon how many holes they improperly punched.

Or, they look at the demographics in the area and compare them with voting trends and exit poles. You're comment, though, I might add, is quite racist. You're implying that African-Americans are unable to properly punch ballots.

Cheers!

Are they putting webcams in the voting booths these days?

Don't be stupid. You should be above that - and you know full well what sorts of methods they use to get their numbers.

If legit, it is the will of the people. Your will doesn't count if you're too lazy to vote, sorry.

What about people who weren't able to make it? You know - people who have to work two minimum wage jobs to support their children, who can't afford to wait in line all day because they need the money. Or people who were forced to cast uncounted provisional ballots for any number of reasons. Their votes don't count either, I guess?

Ok, so this is what I get out of the article: Black and Hispanic democrats are too stupid to punch the card all the way.

That's about what he's saying, isn't it? The 'problem areas' are highly populated with democratic-voting minorities.

Congratulations, Kas! You're officially a racist! If I believed you were stupid enough to actually get that out of the article, I might not be inclined to believe you a racist... but you're clearly intelligent enough to know what the author was talking about. You just prefer to turn it into a racial thing instead of actually considering that he might have a point.

That is, though, not what the author is talking about. For you to know that people punched every hole you have to have looked at the ballot (and presumably you would record the number of ballots). He's talking about ballots that are simply thrown out without being looked at.
Way to change the subject, though.

... Do you even know what a provisional ballot is?

What about people who weren't able to make it? You know - people who have to work two minimum wage jobs to support their children, who can't afford to wait in line all day because they need the money. Or people who were forced to cast uncounted provisional ballots for any number of reasons. Their votes don't count either, I guess?

Your employer is obligated by law to allow you to take time off to vote.

Congratulations, Kas! You're officially a racist! If I believed you were stupid enough to actually get that out of the article, I might not be inclined to believe you a racist... but you're clearly intelligent enough to know what the author was talking about. You just prefer to turn it into a racial thing instead of actually considering that he might have a point.

Huh Huh. He said racist.

Thanks S'Il! I was wondering what to shout when we get our butts sued for copyright infringement.


Not to sway the topic off Bush (with alien help) rigging the elections, Kas being racist, Ahnk being a liberalist and me being hungry, (to S'Il) just what the heck is that funny little creature in your personal pic?

Balogna.